Exhibit A — Conformance Audit
§ 3.1 — Prioritized findings
Documentation § Exhibit A
Paperfort produces the three artifacts Shopify merchants hand to procurement, defense counsel, and the ATG’s office: a paginated WCAG 2.2 AA audit PDF, a hosted /accessibility statement, and a VPAT 2.5Rev conformance report. We don’t touch your storefront. No overlay. No contrast slider. No one-click magic.
axe-core 4.12.1 checks mapped to WCAG 2.2 AA criteria · VPAT 2.5Rev (ITI format) · on the Shopify App Store
Read this first. Paperfort produces defensible documentation and a prioritized remediation plan. It does not guarantee lawsuit prevention or automatic ADA/WCAG compliance.
A short walkthrough inside the Shopify app: run the automated WCAG 2.2 AA scan (axe-core), review findings by severity, then generate the audit and VPAT 2.5Rev PDFs from the same storefront URL.
Not a dashboard. Not a score. Not a widget. Three deliverables, versioned, dated, and exportable — the same paper trail a Fortune-500 legal team would expect.
A paginated WCAG 2.2 AA conformance report. Every success criterion, every finding, every template — with severity, code-level reference, and a prioritized remediation plan your developer can ticket on Monday.
Accessibility Statement
A hosted /accessibility page on your own domain — the URL plaintiff’s counsel looks for first. Versioned, dated, with a real feedback channel and the scope of your most recent audit.
| Criterion | Level | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.1 | A | Supports |
| 1.4.3 | AA | Partial |
| 2.1.2 | A | Remediating |
| 4.1.2 | A | Supports |
The conformance report procurement asks for before renewing. ITI-format VPAT 2.5Rev — the rev enterprise and government buyers require, not the consumer-facing one. One PDF, boilerplate-free, filled in from your actual audit data.
If you’ve shopped this category, you’ve seen the widget — the little wheelchair icon in the corner, the toolbar with contrast sliders and text-size buttons. That category is what we make documents about. It’s not what we sell.
If you’re weighing an accessibility overlay against documentation, these are factual, sourced comparisons — what each product installs, how it’s priced, and what the public record says.
The FTC’s accessiBe settlement didn’t just fine one company. It changed what plaintiff’s counsel looks for in discovery.
On January 3, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission ordered accessiBe — the largest vendor in the accessibility-overlay category — to pay $1 million for deceiving consumers with claims that its AI widget made websites “ADA compliant.”
The settlement did two things at once. First, it made every “AI-powered compliance” claim in the category legally radioactive — the exact copy on every overlay landing page became a liability, not a marketing asset.
Second, and more consequential for merchants: plaintiff’s firms pivoted. A widget on your homepage used to be neutral. Today, it is routinely cited in demand letters as evidence the merchant knew about accessibility obligations and chose a shortcut — the opposite of the defensive posture it was sold as.
What plaintiff’s counsel does not cite as negative evidence: a dated, paginated audit report; a versioned statement page; a VPAT on file. Because those are the artifacts of the actual work.
That’s the category Paperfort is in. We produce the paper trail. You do the remediation. Your developers ticket the findings. And when the letter arrives — and in this category, at some point, it does — you respond with documents, not with a screenshot of a widget.
Four tiers. Published prices. The one-time bundle is for merchants with a demand letter in hand; the subscriptions are for merchants who would rather have the documents ready before the letter arrives.
One storefront. The three documents, refreshed quarterly. For solo merchants who want the paper trail on file.
One storefront, monthly refresh. Priority review when you ship a theme change. For stores over $1M GMV.
Up to 5 client storefronts. White-label cover pages. Procurement-ready VPATs for enterprise deals.
You received a demand letter this week. You need the three documents dated, signed, and filed in seven days. This is that.
Documentation, not legal advice. WCAG 2.2 AA, the EAA, VPATs, and what to do about an ADA demand letter.
Legal
California is the epicenter of web accessibility litigation because its Unruh Civil Rights Act adds $4,000 in statutory damages per violation on top of ADA claims. Federal ADA Title III, on its own, offers plaintiffs only injunctive relief and attorney's fees. The pairing changes the math entirely.
Standards
Choose the right VPAT 2.5Rev edition, fill in the header, evaluate each criterion, record a conformance level with remarks, and re-issue after fixes. Seven steps that turn a blank template into a credible Accessibility Conformance Report.
Standards
WCAG 2.2 AA is the practical bar for e-commerce accessibility. This checklist maps the success criteria most likely to fail on a Shopify storefront, grouped by topic, and notes which ones an automated scan can flag versus which ones need a person.
Answers
Last reviewed June 2026. Paperfort produces defensible documentation and a prioritized remediation plan — not legal advice, and not a promise of compliance.
A real person at each. Replies within one business day, or same-day for demand-letter bundles.
Install help, audit questions, refresh cadence, anything about your store’s three documents.
Bulk deployment across client portfolios, white-label VPATs, procurement-cycle timelines.
Data-subject requests, sub-processor disclosures, DPAs for EU and California buyers.